Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 22,080
Sherman v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mitchell v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tate v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024cv05093
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Officer J. Jackson, Special Agent Devito and John or Jane Doe Officers or Agents #1 to #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Does
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Monica Morris
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Millsaps v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Standridge v. Pierce et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Tyler Standridge
Defendant:
Pierce, Wade and Does Classification and CO 1, Cummins Unit, ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
