Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 22,058
Cox v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cox
Defendant:
Christopher Jefferson, Bailey and Vamhouten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Langley et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Payne, III
Defendant:
Tammy Langley and Turn Key Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Martinez
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levac v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stephens v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Brian Stephens
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Gray et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jay Love
Defendant:
Michelle Gray, S Ricketts and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thatcher v. Holloway et al
as 5:2024cv05070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Thatcher
Defendant:
Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Lieutenant Greg Hobelman and Lieutenant Tyler Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
