Minnesota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,947
Ali v. Ramsey County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Tamir Malik Ali
Defendant:
Ramsey County Sheriff Office, Kelly Wolford, County of Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Menze v. County of Otter Tail et al
as 0:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Aaron O. Menze
Defendant:
County of Otter Tail, Wayne Stein and Heather Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Green v. Does et al
as 0:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Deyonta D. Green
Defendant:
John Does, Michelle Skroch, Holly Jensrud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alexander v. Alexander
as 0:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Mandy M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Alexander v. Nelson
as 0:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Misty Joy Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coonradt v. Krichbaum
as 0:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jordan Coonradt
Defendant:
Krichbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mather v. Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Natalie A. Mather
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services and Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schoeszler v. Nettell et al
as 0:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Eunice Schoeszler
Defendant:
Officer Nettell and Andrew Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beaudry v. Hansen et al
as 0:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Trevor John Beaudry
Defendant:
Caleb Glen Hansen and Becker, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. City of Edina et al
as 0:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Kyle Robert Moore
Defendant:
City of Edina, Jason Behr, Jefferey Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
