Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 5,647
Walton v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv02795
Petitioner:
James Walton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henny v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lokken v. Warden Lino Lakes et al
as 0:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Shawn Duane Lokken
Respondent:
Warden Lino Lakes and DOC Lino-Lakes Prizon Medical Department/ Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02712
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02708
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02696
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02695
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
