Missouri Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 161 - 170 of 12,978
O'Connor v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00908
Plaintiff: Ecko D O'Connor
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03376
Plaintiff: William Prince
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03374
Plaintiff: Antoinette C.F. Thomas
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dixon v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01583
Plaintiff: Judy M. Dixon
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Flake v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01582
Plaintiff: Jennifer N. Flake
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hancock v. O'Malley
as 6:2023cv03370
Plaintiff: Gayla Hancock
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Corbin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff: Marvin I. Corbin
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Browder v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00885
Plaintiff: Toni Anderson Browder
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sims v. Kijakazi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01549
Plaintiff: Carrie Sims
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schaefer v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01541
Plaintiff: Theresa Schaefer
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?