Eighth Circuit Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 334,705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Smith v. Duncan
as 6:2023cv06067
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Deputy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Daniels
as 6:2023cv06066
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bray
Defendant:
Nathan Thomas Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Shook
as 2:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. RBIS, LLC
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Defendant:
RBIS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Rhodes v. Iowa
as 2:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Dante K Rhodes
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MMIC Insurance, Inc. v. Obstetric and Gynecologic Associates of Iowa City and Coralville, P.C.
as 3:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
MMIC Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
Obstetric and Gynecologic Associates of Iowa City and Coralville, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
TiNik v. SoCal Upfitters Inc.
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
TiNik, Inc.
Defendant:
SoCal Upfitters Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hoop v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Brian Hoop
Defendant:
Emma Doe, John Does I-XX and 177.7621 ETHER
Garnishee:
MEXC Global
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Allen v. Bryant
as 0:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Hudson Sawyer Allen
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Kojo addo
Defendant:
Billy R Bryant
Consolidated Defendant:
Lynne McMullen
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
Jody Martineau
Trustee:
Benjamin Taylor Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
