Eighth Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 339,336
Aikens v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00739
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swafford v. Lonoke County Jail We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00900
Plaintiff: Kaitlynn Swafford
Defendant: Lonoke County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindamood et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03003
Plaintiff: Linda Lindamood and Henry Lindamood
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Derek Marshall v. United States
as 23-3179
Petitioner: Derek Marshall
Respondent: United States of America
United States v. Keith Jackson
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Keith Jackson
United States v. Shauwn Nettles
as 23-3176
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Shauwn Nettles
United States v. Mark Comer
as 23-3181
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Mark Edwin Comer, also known as Mark Comer
Terrance Redwine, Jr. v. United States
as 23-3180
Petitioner / Appellant: Terrance Shawn Redwine, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Five Rivers Carpenters, et al v. Covenant Construction Services, et al
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee: Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Royce Peterson and Mike Novy as trustees and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund, and David Unzeitig and Robert Doubek as trustees
Defendant / Appellant: Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Type: Contract Miller Act
John Stapleton, Jr., et al v. Missouri Supreme Court, et al
as 23-3175
Plaintiff / Appellant: John W. Stapleton, Jr. and Linda Stapleton
Defendant / Appellee: Missouri Supreme Court, Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel and Alan D. Pratzel, Chief Disciplinary Counsel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?