U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Robin Bjoroy, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16740
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN PER BJOROY, individually, as successor -in-interest to Alexander Per Bjoroy, decease, and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Alexander Per Bjoroy and JANE KATHRYN BJOROY
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Winfried Schmidt, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16726
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINFRIED SCHMIDT, Individually and as Co-Personal Represenative of the Estate of Julia Chaves de Miranda Schmidt, deceased, MARTHA MARIA CHAVES DE MIRANDA, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Julia Chave de Miranda Schmidt, deceased, WINFRIED SCHMIDT, father of decedent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., MOTOROLA INC. and others
Karla Martins dos Santos, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16730
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLA MARTINS DOS SANTOS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nelson Marinho, deceased, KARLA MARTINS DOS SANTOS, wife of decedent, C. M. M., minior son of decedent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Aldair Gomes de Oliveira, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16731
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALDAIR GOMES DE OLIVEIRA, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marcelo Parente Gomes de Oliveira, ALDAIR GOMES DE OLIVEIRA, father of decedent, MARIETTA ANDRADE PARENTE, mother of decedent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Claudio Henriques, et al v. Airbus SAS, et al
as 11-16735
:
In re: AIR CRASH OVER THE MID-ATLANTIC ON JUNE 1, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDIO MOREIRA HENRIQUES, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Adrian Moreira Henriques, deceased, CLAUDIO MOREIRA HENRIQUES, father of decedent, CLEICI HELOINA DOS SANTOS HENRIQUES, mother of decedent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AIRBUS SAS, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., THALES AVIONICS S.A. and others
Manfred Mrotzek v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 11-56174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANFRED MROTZEK, as personal representative of the estate of Gerd Mrotzek, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, LEACH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Irina Hult v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 11-56178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRINA HULT, as personal representative of the estate of Ann Marie Helene Hult, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, LEACH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Johan Rondonuwu, et al v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 11-56179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHAN L. RONDONUWU, as co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Nguni Toka Rondonuwu, deceased and SYULL MAINSIOUW, as co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Nguni Toka Rondonuwu, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, LEACH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Manfred Mrotzek v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 11-56177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANFRED MROTZEK, as personal representative of the estate of Lucas Mrotzek, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, LEACH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Manfred Mrotzek v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 11-56176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANFRED MROTZEK, as personal representative of the estate of Niklas Mrotzek, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOEING COMPANY, MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, LEACH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
