U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 286
James Fayed v. Warden San Quentin State Prison
as 22-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
Jerry Frye v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99008
Petitioner:
JERRY GRANT FRYE
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Alfredo Garcia v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99007
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFREDO LUCERO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Clarence Dixon v. David Shinn
as 22-99006
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE WAYNE DIXON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
David Gulbrandson v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GULBRANDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, JEFFREY VAN WINKLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison Florence Complex and STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Arizona State Prison Eyman Complex
Zane Floyd v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General
William Witter v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM WITTER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and AARON FORD, Attorney General for the State of Nevada
Shaun Burney v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99002
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAUN KAREEM BURNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Ruben Garza, Jr. v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-99001
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUBEN J. GARZA, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and JASON KIMBLE, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
