U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 111 - 120 of 26,694
USA v. Richard King
as 18-16566
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RICHARD ALAN KING
Gary Long, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 18-16568
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY LEE LONG, Jr., JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MISTIFER, Dr., Challenge Program Coordinator, HAYDEN, Dr., Chief of Psychology and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-56110
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dylan Downey v. Snohomish County Sheriff's Off, et al
as 18-35686
Plaintiff - Appellant: DYLAN J. DOWNEY
Defendant - Appellee: SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TY TRENARY, individually and in their official capacities, TONY ASTON, Bureau Chief, individually and in their official capacities and others
Raul Vega v. Warren Montgomery
as 18-16555
Petitioner - Appellant: RAUL VEGA, AKA Raul Vega-Vega
Respondent - Appellee: WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
Jonathan Troncoza v. USA
as 18-16560
Petitioner - Appellant: JONATHAN TRONCOZA
Respondent - Appellee: ` UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Hale v. Mark Brnovich
as 18-16556
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Delarian Wilson v. Nevada Department of Correct, et al
as 18-16552
Petitioner - Appellant: DELARIAN K. WILSON
Respondent - Appellee: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES DZURENDA, Director, STATE OF NEVADA
Rashad Scott v. W. Montgomery, et al
as 18-56103
Petitioner - Appellant: RASHAD PHILLIP SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Barry Jones v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-99006
Petitioner - Appellee: BARRY LEE JONES
Respondent - Appellant: CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, GEORGE HERMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex, DORA B. SCHRIRO, Warden and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?