Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 51,576
Mason v. Ramsey et al
as 3:2023cv04836
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Mason
Defendant:
Ismail J. Ramsey, Norman Wong and Ronald Smentana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
507 Summit LLC et al v. Liang
as 4:2023mc80243
Petitioner:
507 Summit LLC, Oasis Focus Fund LP and Quadre Investments, L.P.
Respondent:
James Jianzhang Liang
Frost v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023mc80242
Plaintiff:
Vinton Frost
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Silver v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2023cv04849
Plaintiff:
Mary Silver
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alex Gonzalez v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07906
Plaintiff:
Alex Gonzalez
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lawrence McDavid v. Anaheim Global
as 8:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
Lawrence McDavid
Defendant:
Anaheim Global
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Nago
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NIU et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv07928
Plaintiff:
XUEDONG NIU and BAIGE CHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Zheng Jin and Suhao Zhang
Defendant:
Seattle Family Regional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
