Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 782
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01573
Plaintiff:
Jordan Manhxaythavong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Armatis v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Scott Armatis
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
JANE v. Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
as 5:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
SUSAN JANE
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Preiss v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Chris Preiss and Christopher Preiss
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Payton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Payton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Payton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2023at00875
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Payton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Brooks v. Amtrak
as 2:2023cv01255
Defendant:
Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Larry Brooks
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Leyde v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Taylor Leyde
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Mofford v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv05723
Plaintiff:
William J Mofford
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Handley v. Fonteno et al
as 3:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Benjamin Asher Handley
Respondent:
Edward Fonteno and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
