Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 230,800
Reevis v. US District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
US District Court, Spokane County Superior Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith #299789 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Addinika A Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv02439
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. San Benito County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
San Benito County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Monterey County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv02438
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Monterey County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorte v. Lougitan
as 3:2024cv02416
Plaintiff:
Maria del Carmen Gorte
Defendant:
Lougitan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brigitte et al
as 4:2024cv02436
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Brigitte, Yolanda and Kumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Vanatti v. J. Gates et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Lynden Vanatti
Defendant:
J. Gates, O. Pavon, J. Ebaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
