Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 18,730
Kramer v. USA
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner: Fritz Kramer
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Linehan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00245
Petitioner: David Linehan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Valdez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner: Jose Guadalupe Valdez, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mercado v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00015
Petitioner: Erik Mercado
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08000
Petitioner: Murphy Alex Begay
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lenhart v. USA
as 1:2023cv00154
Petitioner: Joseph Vern Lenhart
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Neda Mehrabani v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv10826
Petitioner: Ms. Neda Mehrabani and Neda Mehrabani
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McReynolds v. USA
as 2:2023cv00371
Petitioner: Randy Del McReynolds
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spearson v. USA
as 9:2023cv00155
Petitioner: Robert Dean Spearson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv02083
Petitioner: Latonia Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?