Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 94,623
Gage v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02100
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Gage
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felipe Cabrera-Huato v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2024cv02892
Petitioner:
Felipe Cabrera-Huato
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph Lee Haddick v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00744
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Haddick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michelle Estelle Caldera v. A. Delacruz
as 2:2024cv02937
Petitioner:
Michelle Estelle Caldera
Respondent:
A. Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Extend Time to File
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lachat v. Hendricks
as 6:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Lachat
Respondent:
Kimberly Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Tracey Godfrey
as 9:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huezo v. Haynes
as 4:2024cv05037
Petitioner:
Juan Luna Huezo
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
