Ninth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,956
Mavis v. Laboratory Corporation of America
as 3:2023cv04855
Plaintiff:
Kareem Mavis
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Salazar v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a California Corporation, et al
as 2:2023cv07913
Plaintiff:
Melissa Salazar
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a California Corporation,, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pulu et al v. CableCom, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv04828
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pulu, Thompson Pulu and Maxiumum Fairclough
Defendant:
CableCom, LLC and Jason Pulu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Perez v. It Works Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04829
Plaintiff:
Marites Perez
Defendant:
It Works Marketing, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Veronika Zinali et al v. Coty Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07800
Plaintiff:
Veronika Zinali
Petitioner:
HFC Prestige Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Coty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gomez v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gomez
Defendant:
WinCo Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Pittman v. Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Kawauna Pittman
Defendant:
Kimco Staffing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Aguirre v. MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
as 2:2023cv07710
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Aguirre
Defendant:
MASTERBRAND CABINETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Antoinette Fernandez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 2:2023cv07711
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Fernandez
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
