Ninth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,474
Phillips et al v. Thorntons LLC
as 3:2025cv05214
Plaintiff:
Chondra Phillips and Michelle Panks Griffin
Defendant:
Thorntons LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Phillips et al v. Thorntons LLC
as 3:2025cv05215
Plaintiff:
Chondra Phillips and Michelle Panks Griffin
Defendant:
Thorntons LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
v. Genomic Health, Inc.
as 3:2025cv05222
Defendant:
Genomic Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stone v. Omnicell, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv05229
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stone
Defendant:
Omnicell, Inc. and Dennis Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Tataw v. Resonetics, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv01579
Plaintiff:
Agbor Rose Tataw
Defendant:
Resonetics, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Pena v. L&M Logistics Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv05637
Plaintiff:
Hector Pena
Defendant:
L&M Logistics Group, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Freeman v. Sky Dine, LLC
as 1:2025cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mary K Freeman
Defendant:
Sky Dine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mack v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2025cv05191
Plaintiff:
Nora Mack
Defendant:
Edlyms Gonzalez, Cristiane D. Hernandez, Kevin Kasnick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Daniels et al v. PalAmerican Security California, Inc.
as 2:2025cv01715
Plaintiff:
Haley Daniels and Steven Daniels
Defendant:
PalAmerican Security California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Alford v. Lineage Logistics Services LLC
as 2:2025cv01725
Plaintiff:
Ericka Alford
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
