US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 508
Wilson v. State of Arizona
as 3:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Robert A. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Arizona
Thompson v. Harbison et al
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Carl K. Thompson
Defendant:
Judge Bethany Harbison and Eric A. Ringsmuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Fiona et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lucas Canton Schneider
Defendant:
Fiona and Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Standifer et al v. Department of Law Alaska et al
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Paul Robert Standifer, Jr., A.L.F.S., P.R.O.S. Jr. and others
Defendant:
Department of Law Alaska, Department of Public Safety Alaska, Anchorage Police Department Municipality of Anchorage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
B.A. Jones, S. Nelson and State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansberry v. Entry State of Alaska, et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Entry State of Alaska
Helveston v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Helveston
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, Sparks and Shaddin Tirhi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Goose Creek Correctional Center & DOC
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Goose Creek Correctional Center & DOC
Nicori v. Viator et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Nicori
Defendant:
Brandon Viator, John O. Putikka, Rachel Duvlea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Teas v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Teas
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, James Milburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
