US District Court for the Northern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,336
Greist et al v. LendUS, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Barbara Greist and Susan Schell
Defendant:
LendUS, LLC and CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Keith v. LaserAway Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Angelica Keith
Defendant:
LaserAway Holdings LLC and LaserAway Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Boson v. Shipt,Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
David Boson
Defendant:
Shipt,Inc. and Rob Howard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Moore v. Pathways In Education, Inc., d/b/a Pathways Travels
as 1:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Moore
Defendant:
Pathways In Education, Inc., d/b/a Pathways Travels
Ruiz v. Campbell Soup Company, et al.
as 3:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Javier Herrera Ruiz
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Company and Snyder's-Lance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Buitrago v. TF Courier, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jose Buitrago
Defendant:
TF Courier, Inc., SUBCONTRACTING CONCEPTS, LLC, TFORCE LOGISTICS WEST, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hernndez v. Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Hernndez
Defendant:
Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc., Tek Gill, Balbinder Kaur and others
Dai v. Liu et al
as 5:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
MENGYANG DAI
Defendant:
ERDAN LIU and 3 KINGDOMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ramos Ramirez et al v. Correa et al
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Cruz Ramos Ramirez and Donald Saul Lopez Ramirez
Defendant:
Victor Correa doing business as Unique Paver Stones and Oscar Correa doing business as ODC Construction
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
