Southern District of California Labor Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,260
Asbury v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01871
Plaintiff: Linda Asbury
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation , DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: Diversity Action
Di Ferdinando v. Intrexon Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01826
Plaintiff: Dana M. Di Ferdinando
Defendant: Intrexon Corporation , DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Hawksworth v. OptCTS, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01801
Avila et al v. EGL, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01805
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Topping v. Tuff Shed, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01793
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Topping
Defendant: Tuff Shed, Inc. , DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Scalercio v. Chipotle Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01760
Plaintiff: Derek Scalercio
Defendant: Chipotle Services, LLC , Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: lr Diversity - Labor
Ghosh, M.D. v. Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01691
Plaintiff: Sanjay Ghosh, M.D.
Defendant: Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Ghosh, M.D. v. Mid County Physicians Medical Group, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01690
Plaintiff: Sanjay Ghosh, M.D.
Defendant: Mid County Physicians Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Scalercio v. Chipotle Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01683
Plaintiff: Derek Scalercio
Defendant: Chipotle Services, LLC , Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Labor
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Nemlowill v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01642
Plaintiff: Jim Nemlowill
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?