California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 10,485
Doe v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Clifford Harris and Tameka Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Porter, Jr. v. Rouzeau
as 3:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
Ebonee A. Rouzeau
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Everson v. Pacific Market International, LLC
as 4:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Amanda Everson
Defendant:
Pacific Market International, LLC doing business as Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Castro et al v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC
as 5:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MARIA CASTRO, an individual and FERNANDO CASTRO, an individual
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, a Corporation doing business in the state of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lewis v. Home Depot, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc. and Doe Contractor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
COLBERG v. TANNER
as 2:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
JULIAN LAWRENCE COLBERG
Defendant:
DALLAS B. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Joan Marie Casey v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
Joan Marie Casey
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COLBERG v. TANNER
as 2:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
JULIAN LAWRENCE COLBERG
Defendant:
DALLAS B. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WOODS v. BOYD GAMING CORPORATION
as 5:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
DAVINA WOODS
Defendant:
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fernandez et al
as 2:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Frances Fernandez and Cecille Nguyen
Defendant:
Favorite World, LLC d/b/a Shapermint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
