California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55,742
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner:
Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gildardo M. Pacheco v. Superior Court of Orange County
as 2:2024cv03152
Petitioner:
Gildardo M. Pacheco
Respondent:
Superior Court of Orange County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Lopez v. People
as 5:2024cv02253
Petitioner:
Joel Garcia-Lopez
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00796
Petitioner:
Taiwan Orran Reed
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Madero v. The People
as 1:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Eric Cruz Madero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pink v. Schuyler
as 1:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Dvontae Larome Pink
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Flores v. The People
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Joaquin Flores
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benjamin Gonzalez v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv03147
Petitioner:
Benjamin Gonzalez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Matteson
as 5:2024cv02189
Petitioner:
Jamie Lockett
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
