Idaho Torts - Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Murphy v. Kochava, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cindy Murphy, Scott Connelly, Jenny Watson and others
Defendant:
Kochava, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
U.S. Tactical Supply, Inc. v. BulletProof It, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
U.S. Tactical Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
BulletProof It, LLC and Jeffrey Meining
Ullrich, et al. v. Parr Brown Gee & Loveless
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
George Ullrich, Jami Sturges-Ullrich, Volition, LLC and others
Defendant:
Parr Brown Gee & Loveless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Terteling et al v. Terteling et al
as 1:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Terteling, The Terteling Company and Terteling Trust No.
Defendant:
Nixon Kendal Terteling, Richard A Tinsley and Melanie Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Barden v. Goodsell, et al.
as 4:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Xanthe Goodsell, Gregory Schenk, Sr., Shelia Schenk and others
Plaintiff:
John Barden and John Barden doing business as Fast Lane Auto
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hyde-Rhodes v. Welker et al
as 4:2020cv00598
Defendant:
Misty Welker, Mike Welker, Idaho Health and Welfare and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendez v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC.
as 1:2020cv00588
Defendant:
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC.
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyde-Rhodes v. Idaho Health and Welfare
as 4:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Idaho Health and Welfare
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyde-Rhodes v. Rhodes
as 4:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Ted John Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LeComte v. LeComte, et al.
as 1:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
Byron Douglas LeComte
Defendant:
Wade LeRoux and Dawn Marie LeComte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
