US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 121 - 130 of 15,892
Thomas v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05094
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Debora Thomas
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woodbury-House v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Amanda K Woodbury-House
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans v. Andaz Wailea Resort & Spa et al
as 1:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
Brian Evans
Defendant:
Christina Fry, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Donges v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00266
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Justin Donges
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. Ikon Health LLC
as 4:2024cv05093
Defendant:
Ikon Health LLC doing business as Invigor Medical LLC
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Johnson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00265
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zazueta v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ezequiel Zazueta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Miller and Travis Miller
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
