US District Court for the Western District of Washington Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,728
Fox v. Couch
as 2:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Fox
Defendant:
Rogers Couch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
Fox v. Mellette et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Fox
Defendant:
Mellette and Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Gay et al
as 3:2023cv06136
Plaintiff:
Jaramie L Smith
Defendant:
Tracy Gay and Bear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali-El v. CT Corporation System et al
as 2:2023cv01902
Plaintiff:
Idris Turner Ali-El
Defendant:
CT Corporation System, Anthony Heredia and Janine Brown-Weise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klobas v. United States Government
as 3:2023cv06128
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Klobas
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Recinos v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06133
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Chase Freedom Card, Chase Amazon Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Recinos v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06123
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Chase Freedom Card, Chase Amazon Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Tacoma Police Department
as 3:2023cv06115
Plaintiff:
Andrew Baldwin
Defendant:
Tacoma Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peridot Tree WA Inc v. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Control Board et al
as 3:2023cv06111
Plaintiff:
Peridot Tree WA Inc
Defendant:
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Control Board and William Lukela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Recinos v. Washington State et al
as 3:2023cv06108
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Washington State and Unknown Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
