District Court Cases in Washington

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 80,516
Rutherford v. Central Bank of Kansas City
as 3:2024cv05299
Plaintiff: Samuel C Rutherford, III
Defendant: Central Bank of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
Asimba v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff: Maureen Achieng Asimba
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant: Spokane County Superior Court, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner: Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner: Ryan Rowley
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner: Tayan Jackson
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner: Daniel Norton
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner: Jorge J Navarette
Respondent: R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America et al v. Kumar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00331
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Rodas Aguirre v. Easy Automation Inc et al
as 4:2024cv05040
Plaintiff: Teresa Rodas Aguirre
Defendant: Easy Automation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?