Ninth Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 171 - 180 of 1,119,021
Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht, et al.
as 24-2552
Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, INC.
Defendant: JEFFERY ALFRED UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities and JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities
Jackson, et al. v. City of Federal Way Police Department, et al.
as 24-2556
Plaintiff: LAURA LEAH JACKSON and CORNELL STEFON DIJOHN BERRY, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIGO REAL ESTATE, other Tony Flaherty LLC and RESERVE AT SEATAC
Safadi v. County of Snohomish, et al.
as 24-2550
Plaintiff: AMAR SAFADI
Defendant: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, SNOHOMISH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY and SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Toney v. The Clorox Company
as 24-2567
Plaintiff: JEFFREY TONEY
Defendant: THE CLOROX COMPANY
Nystrom v. Khana Marine LTD., et al.
as 24-2553
Plaintiff: ELIAS NYSTROM
Defendant: KHANA MARINE LTD. and NOK CO. LTD. SA, in personam
Willis v. United States of America
as 24-2548
Plaintiff: KENTRELL WILLIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jimenez v. United States Department of Transportation, et al.
as 24-2557
Plaintiff: MARK JIMENEZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ELAINE L. CHO, Hon. and PETE BUTTIGIEG
Martinez-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2549
Petitioner: ANA MARIA DILSIA MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, GERSON RICARDO AMAYA-MARTINEZ and DIEGO IVAN AMAYA-MARTINEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gutierrez v. Hill
as 24-2555
Petitioner: SALVADOR GUTIERREZ
Respondent: JAMES HILL
Rodas De Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2561
Petitioner: SONIA ELIZABETH RODAS DE VASQUEZ, DAVID ELEAZAR VASQUEZ RODAS and JORGE ENRIQUE VASQUEZ RODAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?