US District Court for the District of Alaska
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,379
Nautilus Insurance Group v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Group
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. Angol
as 2:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Ronald K. Barr, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Terry Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
Sara Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Kirk v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Cecil Kirk
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Francisco v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
David Losongco Francisco
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Massey v. Spaan et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Massey, Jr.
Defendant:
Micheal Robin Spaan, Philip R. Volland and Micheal L. Wolverton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
