Middle District of Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 15,545
Wilson v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00559
Plaintiff: Arlis Kentrick Wilson
Defendant: Christopher Gordy, Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cieutat et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00560
Plaintiff: Jeffery James Jackson
Defendant: Mark Alan Cieutat, Guy Naquin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Wesley Joe Cosby
Defendant: Karla Jones, Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. Sims et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2017cv00556
Plaintiff: Walter Jamar Avery
Defendant: Officer Sims, Sgt. Theodore, Ms. Stewart
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Randolph County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2017cv00557
Plaintiff: Timothy L. Moss
Defendant: Randolph County Jail, Alexander Phillip, Cirby Bassit and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Williams et al
as 2:2017mc03790
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kendell Williams
Garnishee: Luke Industries
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00554
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Conners
Defendant: Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles, Charles Tipton, Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00553
Plaintiff: William Patrick Miller
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. City of Montgomery (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2017cv00552
Plaintiff: Jeremy Lamar Johnson
Defendant: City of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00555
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?