US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00421
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff: Betty Alexander
Defendant: Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Craig v. F. et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff: Anthony M Craig, Jr
Defendant: Melanie F. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff: Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant: Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortiz v. Angel et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff: Reynaldo Ortiz
Defendant: Edgar A Angel, Andrew T Posten and Alabaster, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff: Fatuma Robertson
Defendant: Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00407
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?