Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,598
Kuponiyi v. Strickland et al
as 5:2017cv01755
Petitioner: Olusola Kuponiyi
Respondent: Michael Strickland, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Hillcrest Behavioral Health
as 2:2017cv01751
Plaintiff: Darrius A Howard
Defendant: Hillcrest Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Bradley
as 2:2017cv01715
Petitioner: Chante Williams
Respondent: Patricia Bradley
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. Gordy et al
as 2:2017cv01682
Petitioner: Adrian Kermit Duncan
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Bolling
as 2:2017cv01659
Petitioner: Joe Herman Reid
Respondent: Leon Bolling
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Brookwood Baptist Hospital Behavioral Medicine
as 2:2017cv01598
Petitioner: Jacquelyn Howard
Respondent: Brookwood Baptist Hospital Behavioral Medicine
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garten v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 7:2017cv01584
Petitioner: Kathryn G Garten
Respondent: Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heulett v. Billups
as 5:2017cv01576
Petitioner: Anthony T Heulett
Respondent: Phyllis Billups
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hardwick v. Billups
as 2:2017cv01574
Petitioner: Deltron Hardwick
Respondent: Phyllis Billups
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quates v. Thomas et al
as 2:2017cv01561
Petitioner: Joseph Quates
Respondent: Willie Thomas, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?