Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,685
Guidry v. Warden
as 1:2018cv00941
Petitioner: Lee Guidry
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts v. Dunn
as 4:2018cv00921
Petitioner: Barbara Roberts
Respondent: Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Walker County Sheriff
as 6:2018cv00911
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Walker
Respondent: Walker County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvaro v. State of Alabama
as 7:2018cv00900
Petitioner: Jose Alvaro
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Files v. Bolling et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00871
Plaintiff: Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant: Leon Bolling, Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner: Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent: Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00838
Petitioner: Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent: Leon Bolling, Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Speight v. Bradley et al
as 2:2018cv00816
Petitioner: Mackese Walker Speight
Respondent: P Bradley, U S Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crowe v. Adkins et al
as 2:2018cv00803
Petitioner: Thomas Doyle Crowe
Respondent: Ron Adkins, James Underwood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morton v. Babers
as 2:2018cv00788
Petitioner: Mark Twain Morton
Respondent: Babers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?