Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Spencer v. Dunn
as 2:2016cv01877
Petitioner: Kerry M Spencer
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Van Pelt v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv01849
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Woods v. Stewart et al
as 2:2016cv01758
Petitioner: Nathaniel Woods
Respondent: Cynthia Stewart, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Sneed v. Dunn
as 5:2016cv01442
Petitioner: Ulysses Charles Sneed
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Davis v. Gordy et al
as 1:2016cv01041
Petitioner: Derrick Lamar Davis
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Dunn
as 5:2016cv00473
Petitioner: James Edward Barber
Respondent: Jefferson F Dunn
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Gavin v. Dunn
as 4:2016cv00273
Petitioner: Keith Edmund Gavin
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Marshall v. Dunn
as 2:2015cv01694
Petitioner: William Bruce Marshall
Respondent: Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Smith v. Sharp et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Petitioner: Kenneth Eugene Smith
Respondent: William G. Sharp, Jr. , Luther Strange
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Musgrove v. Thomas
as 2:2014cv02252
Petitioner: Donnis George Musgrove
Respondent: Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?