US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 992
Reedy v. Folks
as 1:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Kassey Reedy
Respondent:
Sharon Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Tate
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Easterling Correctional Facility and Steve Marsall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Folks
as 1:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Lamont Thomas and K.A.A.I. Thomas El Bey
Respondent:
Lt. Sharon Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacey v. Potts
as 1:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Adrian L. Lacey
Respondent:
David Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Davis William Nelson and William N. Davis
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Woods
as 1:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Myles Xavier Smith
Respondent:
Michael Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joseph Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Johnathan M. Parker
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Calloway et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Brandon Elliot Carter
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
