US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Reynolds v. Latco, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv05081
Plaintiff:
David Reynolds
Defendant:
Latco, Inc. and SAR Biomass Energy Systems, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Danfoss Scroll Technologies, LLC v. PPG Industries, Inc.
as 6:2011cv06014
Plaintiff:
Danfoss Scroll Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomlinson v. Reebok International LTD.
as 5:2011cv05036
Plaintiff:
Patty Tomlinson
Defendant:
Reebok International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McNeel v. KaVo Dental Technologies, LLC
as 5:2010cv05043
Plaintiff:
Dean McNeel
Defendant:
KaVo Dental Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Adkison v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 6:2010cv06013
Plaintiff:
Mark Adkison
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodgers v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
David Russell Rodgers
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Willett v. Astrazeneca PLC
as 6:2008cv06008
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Willett
Defendant:
Astrazeneca PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Enviro-Kleen Enterprises, L.P. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02136
Plaintiff:
Enviro-Kleen Enterprises, L.P.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godfrey et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv05132
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Godfrey, Andrew J Godfrey, Lynda L Godfrey and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Advantage Information Services, LLC v. Business Information Solutions Group et al
as 3:2006cv03059
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
