US District Court for the District of Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,205
Langan v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08045
Plaintiff:
Morgan Joseph Langan
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Treasurer, Chip Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
More v. Mayo Clinic et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Pamela D More and Pamela Diane More
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Hospital and Rachel Lindor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Henry v. Newman et al
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bernard Thomas Henry, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Newman, Victoria Steele, Gary Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Innovative Funding Services
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Deyra Pamela Carranza Aguilar
Defendant:
Innovative Funding Services doing business as Tresl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mangus v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Teresa Mangus
Defendant:
Joseph Kiefer and Stasy Avelar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilkinson et al v. Choice Hotels
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Andrea M Wilkinson and Tena C Morgan
Defendant:
Choice Hotels doing business as Comfort Inn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Government
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert W Robinson
Defendant:
Carol A Robinson and Tami P Sexton
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
