U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Town of Portsmouth, et al v. Lewis, et al
as 13-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PORTSMOUTH, RI
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DANIEL J. BERMAN, in his official capacity as Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Interested Party:
TIVERTON, RI and BRISTOL, RI
Friends of Merrymeeting Bay, et al v. Hydro Kennebec, LLC, et al
as 13-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF MERRYMEETING BAY and ENVIRONMENT MAINE
Defendant - Appellee:
HYDRO KENNEBEC, LLC and BROOKFIELD POWER US ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
Strahan v. Roughead, et al
as 13-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ROUGHEAD, Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, Department of Defense and DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary, Department of the Navy
Interested Party:
FISH & RICHARDSON
Paolino, et al v. JF Realty, LLC, et al
as 12-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS PAOLINO and MARIE ISSA
Defendant - Appellee:
JF REALTY, LLC, JOSEPH FERREIRA, ROBERT YABROUDY and others
Colon-Cabrera v. Esso Standard Oil Company, et al
as 11-2477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL A. COLON-CABRERA
Defendant - Appellee:
ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY (PUERTO RICO), INC.
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. (ERTEC) and JOSE C. AGRELOT-PENA
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Lovgren v. Locke, et al
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Strahan v. Bowles, et al
as 11-1822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Plaintiff:
JEREMY SHUGAR
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL DIODATI, Director, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, MARY GRIFFIN, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game and IAN A. BOWLES, Secretary, Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
Defendant:
CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, a/k/a Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies and CHARLES MAYO
Interested Party:
RICHARD DELANEY, PROVINCETOWN CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES, FREDERICK O'REGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
