U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,662
Lucero v. Coppinger, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, V, STAFFORD GRAVELY, ALVAH PIKE and others
Defendant:
KEVIN COPPINGER, GEORGE GLYNOS, Individually and in their official capacities, KEVIN COPPINGER, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity and others
Tassone v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1053
Plaintiff:
GARY TASSONE
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., NANCY RUOTOLO HULL, DOROTHY KRUCK and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Pinney v. Police of La Salle Illinois, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
LASALLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LASALLE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, LASALLE COUNTY COURT and others
Carleton v. Wintle, et al
as 24-1032
Plaintiff:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant:
PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAINE CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
