U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Labor Cases

Fair Labor Standards Act Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Curtis, et al v. Contract or Mgmt. Service
as 16-2273
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT CURTIS, on behalf of himself and all others situated, ROBERT LOWELL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Cichocki, et al v. Mass Bay Community College, et al
as 16-2195
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY CICHOCKI, Y. DOLLY HWANG
Defendant - Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, JOHN O'DONNELL, ROBIN NELSON BAILEY and others
Hamilton, et al v. Partners Healthcare System Inc, et al
as 16-2087
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, LYNNE P. CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, CLAIRE KANE, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, INC., BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: YOUVILLE HOSPITAL & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., JAMES J. MONGAN, MD, DENNIS D. COLLING
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION
Hamilton, et al v. Partners Healthcare System Inc, et al
as 16-2088
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, LYNNE P. CUNNINGHAM, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated, CLAIRE KANE, on behalf of herself and all other employees similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, INC., BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: YOUVILLE HOSPITAL & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., JAMES J. MONGAN, MD, DENNIS D. COLLING
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION
O'Connor, et al v. Oakhurst Dairy, et al
as 16-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN O'CONNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CHRISTOPHER O'CONNOR, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JAMES ADAM COX, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: OAKHURST DAIRY, DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC.
Lacombe, et al v. Westfield ATF, LLC, et al
as 16-1448
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANDREW LACOMBE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MICHAEL FALCONE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANIEL MURRAY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: WESTFIELD ATF, LLC, FOUR GUYS FITNESS, LLC, L&P GROUP, LLC and others
Defendant: NE FIT, LLC, ANYTIME FITNESS, LLC
Cruz v. Hagel, et al
as 16-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAMUEL CRUZ
Defendant: LEON PANETA, Secretary of Defense
Defendant - Appellee: DODEA-DDESS, DoD Education Activity, Domestic Dependents Elementary and Secondary Schools, CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense
Chach, et al v. Fairhaven Excavating, Inc., et al
as 16-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOMINGO CHACH, MIGUEL CHOC
Defendant - Appellee: FAIRHAVEN EXCAVATING, INC., ACE ASPHALT CO., INC., ROBERT RODERIQUES, individually and as Treasurer of Fairhaven Excavating, Inc. and as Treasurer of Ace Asphalt, Co., Inc.
Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.
as 15-2364
Plaintiff - Appellee: DOMINIC OLIVEIRA, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: NEW PRIME, INC.
Schwann, et al v. Fedex Ground Package Sys, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1214
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLAYTON SCHWANN, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, THOMAS LEDUC, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, MANUEL MONTROND, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDEX, CO., d/b/a FedEx Home Delivery

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?