U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 55,298
USA v. Jermaine Dampier
as 17-10301
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JERMAINE OTIS DAMPIER
Brian Morgan v. Arthur Putman, et al
as 17-10290
Interested Party - Appellant: ARTHUR PUTMAN
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC STORAGE
: SERVICE
Edward Valentin v. USA
as 17-10220
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD VALENTIN
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Cobble v. John Doe, et al
as 17-10099
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN DOE, District Attorney of Cherokee County, U.S. GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-10075
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Warren Gregory v. City of Tarpon Springs, et al
as 17-10072
Plaintiff - Appellant: WARREN GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS, STEVE GASSEN, in his official capacity as a Police Officer and Individually a.k.a. Steve Gaston, CHRISTOPHER LEMMON, Police Officer
In re: Walter Morris, Jr.
as 17-10084
Petitioner: In re: WALTER JAMES MORRIS, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Raul Ramos
as 17-10035
Petitioner: In re: RAUL RAMOS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Erica Bryant v. USA, et al
as 17-10004
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERICA Y. BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, United States of America, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Barcliff, LLC, et al v. M/V Deep Blue, IMO No. 9215359
as 16-17755
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARCLIFF, LLC, d.b.a. Radcliff/Economy Marine Services
Intervenor - Appellee: ING BANK N.V., P. O. Box 1800 ALP B.02.050 Amsterdam 1000 BV Netherland
Defendant - Appellee: M/V DEEP BLUE, IMO NO. 9215359, her engines, apparel, furniture, equipment, appurtenances, tackle, etc., in rem

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?