U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,126
US v. Nunez-Gomez
as 19-1863
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ALBERTO JOSE NUNEZ-GOMEZ
Rosario v. US
as 19-1851
Petitioner / Appellant: OSCAR ALPHONSO ROSARIO
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Acevedo v. US
as 19-1873
Petitioner / Appellant: EDGAR ACEVEDO
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Bien Aime v. Barr
as 19-1898
Petitioner: LEONIDE JEAN PAUL BIEN AIME
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
US v. Cobb
as 19-1847
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL COBB
US v. Farah
as 19-1867
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: SCOTT D. FARAH
Pagan-Lisboa, et al v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 19-1877
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIE V. PAGAN-LISBOA, DANIEL JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Social Security Administration
Munoz-Turcios, et al v. Barr
as 19-1884
Petitioner: JOSE RENE FUENTEZ-MUNOZ, JUANA MELISA MUNOZ-TURCIOS
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Bailey v. Dal Global Services LLC
as 19-1875
Defendant / Appellee: DAL GLOBAL SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE BAILEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?