U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 34,573
Robert Mickens v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT MICKENS
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Randy Padilla v. Township of Hamilton, et al
as 17-2163
Plaintiff - Appellee: RANDY PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee: TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, HAMILTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant: OFFICER JAMES SCOTT, Badge #347, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the Hamilton Police Department
In re: Kirk Simmons
as 17-2147
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: KIRK A. SIMMONS
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: LEONARD P. STARK
Dwayne Brown v. Superintendent Retreat SCI, et al
as 17-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant: DWAYNE BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: John E. Reardon, et al
as 17-2145
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant - Respondent: VINCENT SEGAL, RICHARD KLEIN, PAGE and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: NOEL L. HILLMAN
Michael Wiggins v. Wayne MacManiman, et al
as 17-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL WIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: WAYNE MACMANIMAN, 32BJ SEIU
In re: Dwayne Parker
as 17-2133
Petitioner: In re: DWAYNE PARKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jonathan Pena v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 17-2136
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN PENA
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kim Millbrook v. USA, et al
as 17-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIM LEE MILLBROOK
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, LT. FOSROT, S.I.S. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?