U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,513
Richard Lavonte Blanks, Sr. v. Warden Graham
as 16-7693
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD LAVONTE BLANKS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN GRAHAM, BRIAN E. FROSH, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Robert Johnson v. Hubert Corpening
as 16-7689
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: HUBERT CORPENING, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institution
Isiah James, Jr. v. Warden Ridgeland CI
as 16-7692
Petitioner - Appellant: ISIAH JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent: JON OZMINT
Joe Fulgham v. Jack Barber
as 16-7687
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE LEE FULGHAM
Respondent - Appellee: JACK W. BARBER, Interim Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Development Services
Steven Prentice v. State of North Carolina
as 16-7678
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Oden v. Eric D. Wilson
as 16-7680
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM ODEN
Respondent - Appellee: ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex
James B. Curry v. Warden of Lee Correctional
as 16-7682
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES B. CURRY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
William Owens v. Tracy Ray
as 16-7675
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM A. OWENS
Respondent - Appellee: TRACY RAY, HAROLD CLARKE, Director
W. Robert Wardell, Jr. v. Andrew Mansukhani
as 16-7672
Petitioner - Appellant: W. ROBERT WARDELL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: ANDREW MANSUKHANI, Warden, FCI Estill
Don Mitchell Wilborn v. Andrew Mansukhani
as 16-7668
Petitioner - Appellant: DON MITCHELL WILBORN
Respondent - Appellee: ANDREW MANSUKHANI, Warden, FCI Estill

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?