U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,429
Kurt Rillema v. Beauregard Harvey
as 24-1115
Petitioner:
KURT RILLEMA
Defendant:
BEAUREGARD MAXIMMILIAN HARVEY
Alexandra Yonkov v. Maximus Holding Group LLC, et al
as 24-3056
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA YONKOV, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Maximus Holding Group LLC
Defendant:
MAXIMUS HOLDING GROUP LLC, BRICKHAUS MANAGEMENT, INC., ANDREW E. BRICKMAN and others
Antar Rowe v. JPMorgan Chase & Co
as 24-3018
Plaintiff:
ANTAR TARIQ ROWE
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
Mawule Tepe v. Javitch Block LLC, et al
as 23-6088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVITCH BLOCK LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 23-6090
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, LLP, Law Firm and FRANKIE NEIL SPERO, Attorney
Mawule Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 23-6098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Mawule Tepe v. Travis R. McDonough, et al
as 23-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, in his U.S. District Chief Judge position, JANE DOE, I, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position, JANE DOE, II, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position and others
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JAVITCH BLOCK LLC
Ricardo Martinez-Porte v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al
as 23-3971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ-PORTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION and W/S PACKAGING GROUP, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
