U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 103,784
Adam Hawthorne v. MacKenzie Bennington, et al
as 18-15693
Plaintiff - Appellant: ADAM HAWTHORNE
Defendant - Appellee: MACKENZIE BENNINGTON, STANLEY SHINAULT, Correctional Officer, JOHN PERRY, D.O.N. and others
USA v. Juan Navarro-Garcia
as 18-10147
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JUAN NAVARRO-GARCIA
USA v. David Phan
as 18-10148
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID TRUNG QUOC PHAN
USA v. Jack Seibert
as 18-10149
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JACK SEIBERT
USA v. Juan Fuentes-Galvez
as 18-10150
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JUAN ANTONIO FUENTES-GALVEZ
Rafael Goins v. City & County of San Francisco
as 18-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAFAEL GOINS
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Las Vegas Development Group, L v. SRMOF II 2012-1 Trust, U.S. Ba, et al
as 18-15690
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC
Intervenor - Appellee: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Defendant - Appellee: SRMOF II 2012-1 TRUST, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, an unknown business entity, MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps
Donald Walden, Jr., et al v. State of Nevada, et al
as 18-15691
Plaintiff - Appellee: DONALD WALDEN, Jr., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS and others
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Richard Rojas v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-15692
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD ROJAS
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Godigital, Inc. v. Contentbridge Systems, LLC
as 18-55521
Plaintiff - Appellant: GODIGITAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee: CONTENTBRIDGE SYSTEMS, LLC, a California limited liability company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?