U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Antitrust Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Charles Kinney v. State Bar of California, et al
as 16-16689
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Sea Breeze Salt, Inc., et al v. Mitsubishi Corporation, et al
as 16-56350
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEA BREEZE SALT, INC., a California corporation, INNOFOOD, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation
Defendant - Appellee: MITSUBISHI CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a New York corporation, EXPORTADORA DE SAL, S.A. DE C.V., a Mexican corporation and others
Stephen Stetson, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 16-56313
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN STETSON, an individual and all others similarly situated, SHANE LAVIGNE, individual and all others similarly situated, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, individual and all others similary situated and others
Objector - Appellee: SETH BRYANT GRISSOM, JAMES RALPH GARRISON, III, DUSTIN KENNEMER and others
Defendant - Appellee: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation doing business as BAR/BRI, KAPLAN, INC.
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16427
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16399
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16395
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16400
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16373
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16374
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: DONNIE CLIFTON
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16371
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: SEAN HULL, GORDON B. MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?