U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Environmental Matters Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 614
Olympic Forest Coalition v. Coast Seafoods Company
as 16-35957
Plaintiff - Appellee: OLYMPIC FOREST COALITION, a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellant: COAST SEAFOODS COMPANY, a Washington corporation
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35953
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, WILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: NORTHWEST RIVERPARTNERS
Pacificans for a Scenic Coast, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 16-17081
Plaintiff - Appellant: PACIFICANS FOR A SCENIC COAST, PACIFICANS FOR HIGHWAY 1 ALTERNATIVES, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MALCOLM DOUGHERTY
Pacificans for a Scenic Coast, et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 16-16990
Plaintiff - Appellee: PACIFICANS FOR A SCENIC COAST, PACIFICANS FOR HIGHWAY 1 ALTERNATIVES, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Defendant: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MALCOLM DOUGHERTY
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35889
Plaintiff - Appellee: AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, WILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES
Intervenor-Defendant: NORTHWEST RIVERPARTNERS
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-35866
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, GEORGE WUERTHNER and others
Defendant - Appellee: SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, in her official capacity, DAN ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in his official capacity, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
State of California Department v. Westside Delivery LLC, et al
as 16-56558
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
Defendant - Appellee: WESTSIDE DELIVERY LLC, DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. USFS, et al
as 16-35829
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, IDAHO SPORTING CONGRESS, NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, THOMAS TIDWELL, Chief of the Forest Service, KEITH LANNOM, Forest Supervisor for Payette National Forest and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ADAMS COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, PAYETTE FOREST COALITION, an unincorporated Idaho association
America Unites for Kids, et al v. Sylvia Rousseau, et al
as 16-56390
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICA UNITES FOR KIDS, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA ROUSSEAU, In Her Official Capacity As co-interim Superintendent Of The Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District, CHRISTOPHER KING, In His Official Capacity As co-interim Superintendent Of The Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District, JAN MAEZ, In Her Official Capacity As Associate Superintendent And Chief Financial Officer Of The Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District and others
Clatsop Residents Against WalM, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 16-35767
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLATSOP RESIDENTS AGAINST WALMART (CRAW), unincorporated association, SARA MEYER
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, a federal agency, SHAWN ZINSZER, in his official capacity as Chief of the Corps Portland District Regulatory Branch

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?