U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Environmental Matters Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 689
Greenpeace, Inc., et al v. Earl Stewart, et al
as 17-35945
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREENPEACE, INC., CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee: EARL STEWART, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Dine Citizens Against Ruining, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 17-17320
Plaintiff - Appellant: DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, AMIGOS BRAVOS and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY LLC
County of White Pine, et al v. BLM, et al
as 17-17263
Plaintiff - Appellant: COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, GREAT BASIN WATER NETWORK, CENTRAL NEVADA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY and others
Defendant - Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 17-17252
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, UTAH AUDUBON COUNCIL, UTAH RIVERS COUNCIL and others
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 17-17152
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, UTAH AUDUBON COUNCIL, UTAH RIVERS COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant: SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Daniel Ashe, et al
as 17-35859
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior, RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Deparment of the Interior
Pacific Coast Federation of Fi, et al v. Donald Glaser, et al
as 17-17130
Plaintiff - Appellant: PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, FRIENDS OF THE RIVER and others
Defendant - Appellee: DONALD R. GLASER, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, SAN LUIS & DELTA MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
Montana Environmental Informat v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining, et al
as 17-35841
Plaintiff - Appellee: MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING, an agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ROBERT POSTLE, in his official capacity as Program Support Division Manager of U.S. Office of Surface Mining Western Region and others
Intervenor-Defendant: SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
Montana Environmental Informat v. U.S. Office of Surface Mining, et al
as 17-35843
Plaintiff - Appellee: MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER
Defendant: U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING, an agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ROBERT POSTLE, in his official capacity as Program Support Division Manager of U.S. Office of Surface Mining Western Region and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
Sequoia Forestkeeper v. Eric La Price, et al
as 17-17011
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC LA PRICE, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Western Divide Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest, ALFRED WATSON, KEVIN ELLIOTT and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: SIERRA FOREST PRODUCTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?