U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56579
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Sharp v. J. Anastasia, et al
as 17-56580
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY SHARP
Defendant - Appellee: J. ANASTASIA, Detective
Defendant: RAY LARRIVA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17105
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Jehan Mir v. Sharon Levine, et al
as 17-56576
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEHAN ZEB MIR, MD
Defendant - Appellee: SHARON LEVINE, M.D. In Official Capacity as Past President, Medical Board of California, KIMBERLY KIRCHMEYER, In Official Capacity as Executive Director Medical Board of California
Mark Major v. City and County of SF, et al
as 17-17108
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK E. MAJOR
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, WEGGENMAN, Sergeant
Derrick Lyons v. Multnomah County, et al
as 17-35849
Plaintiff - Appellant: DERRICK LEE LYONS
Defendant - Appellee: MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OLE ERSSON, Dr.; personally, MARIA PEREZ, RN, personally and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56573
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-56575
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff - Appellant: GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
James Miller v. Amir Kashani, et al
as 17-56567
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee: AMIR KASHANI, Dr., L.A.C. AND U.S.C. MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, #2 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?