US District Court for the Central District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 84,393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kotlarsz v. Integrity Vehicle Services, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Melanie Kotlarsz
Defendant:
Integrity Vehicle Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tracy Hyman v. Sinclair Inc.
as 2:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hyman
Defendant:
Sinclair Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frontier Dental Supply Inc. v. Gustavo Rivera Madrid et al
as 2:2024cv02131
Plaintiff:
Dental Supply Inc. doing business as MVP Dental Supplies
Defendant:
Gustavo Rivera Madrid and Marae Kay Onsgard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, v. Kelterite Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02130
Plaintiff:
LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER,
Defendant:
Kelterite Corporation and Kelterite Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Ysela Sandoval v. Warden
as 5:2023cv01572
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.