US District Court for the Northern District of California Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 22,736
Anderson v. City of Alameda et al
as 4:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Adroa Anderson
Defendant:
City of Alameda and Benjamin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Singh v. Jonas et al
as 4:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh Bains, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Tiger Shroff and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Williams v. City of Emeryville et al
as 3:2024cv02105
Plaintiff:
Taurice Williams
Defendant:
City of Emeryville, Dino Cristiani, Baylee Worthen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Alameda County
as 3:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jahbree Roberson
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. California Massage Therapy Council
as 4:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hall
Defendant:
California Massage Therapy Council
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dorsey v. County of Alameda
as 4:2024cv02089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dorsey
Defendant:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Balu v. Druckman et al
as 3:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Arvind Balu
Defendant:
Rebecca Druckman, Stephen Hedstrom, Jan Layfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
