Southern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,306
Farley v. Madden
as 3:2017cv00300
Petitioner: Austin Jeffrey Farley
Respondent: R. Madden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charfauros v. Unknown We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00266
Petitioner: Alex Ray Charfauros
Respondent: Unknown
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrientos-Ramirez v. United States Of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00240
Petitioner: Claudio Barrientos-Ramirez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnett v. Montgomery
as 3:2017cv00209
Petitioner: Brian Keith Barnett
Respondent: W.L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Tampkins
as 3:2017cv00210
Petitioner: Nestor R. Morales
Respondent: C.Y. Tampkins
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Swanson v. Cynthia Tampkins
as 3:2017cv00178
Petitioner: George Swanson
Respondent: Cynthia Tampkins
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mundy v. Madden
as 3:2017cv00174
Petitioner: Andrew M. Mundy
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cogswell v. Superior Court of San Diego County et al
as 3:2017cv00118
Petitioner: Henry Ivan Cogswell
Respondent: Superior Court of San Diego County, Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooten v. Kernan et al
as 3:2017cv00094
Petitioner: William Fred Wooten
Respondent: Scott Kernan, Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shack v. Honorable Presiding Judge
as 3:2017cv00100
Petitioner: James Darnell Shack
Respondent: Honorable Presiding Judge
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?