US District Court for the Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,073
Nguon v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moran-Munoz v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Javier Moran-Munoz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wallace v. Montgomery
as 3:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Wallace
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Mychal Reed
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
Tim Jackson
Respondent:
J. Hill and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. U.S. District Court et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
U.S. District Court, Judges/Clerks Office Deputy and Janis L. Sammartino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnette v. Hixon
as 3:2024cv00231
Petitioner:
Beau Burnette
Respondent:
Kevin Hixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starr v. Covello et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Ciara Sky Starr
Respondent:
Patrick Covello and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braggs v. Madden
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Charles Braggs
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
